OPPO Reno 14 Vs vivo V60 Full Comparison Guide 2025

Telegram Group Join Now

WhatsApp Group Join Now

I’ve been testing the OPPO Reno 14 and Vivo V60, two popular smartphones in the Rs 38,000 to Rs 40,000 range. I’ve analyzed three comparison videos to give you a balanced view. One phone stands out in more ways than I expected. Let’s compare them.

Why Compare These Two?

I often get questions about mid-range phones. People are very curious about brands like OPPO and Vivo. They lead in physical stores. People are unsure because both series—the Reno and V—are known for their cameras and style. Last year, the Reno 13 and V50 sparked similar debates, and now their successors are here. In my experience, these comparisons help cut through the hype. I’ll focus on design, display, performance, camera, battery, software, and more. I’ll use real user feedback from the reviews. If you’re shopping with a budget under 40K, this should help you decide.

Design and Build: Premium Feel Matters

Design is personal. I prefer phones that feel nice to hold and are also durable. From what I’ve seen, the OPPO Reno 14 stands out here.

Reno 14 is more compact at 6.59 inches and 187 grams, perfect for one-handed use. It’s lighter and slimmer than the Vivo V60.
Reno 14 has a glass front and back with a metal frame, feeling solid and premium. Vivo V60 has glass and a plastic frame, feeling cheaper. I prefer Reno’s flat, modern design.
Both designs are eye-catching. The Reno’s soft glow and metal frame make it look premium. They both have an IP69 rating for dust and water resistance. The Reno uses durable Gorilla Glass 7i, while the Vivo features Schott glass.

Overall, if I had to pick based on in-hand feel, I’d go with the Reno 14. It’s not just about looks; that metal frame adds a touch of luxury without extra cost.

Display: Resolution vs Size

Displays are crucial for me since I watch a ton of videos and game occasionally. These two offer different experiences, and it’s a close call.

Screen Specs: The Reno 14 packs a 6.59-inch 1.5K resolution AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate—sharp and smooth. The Vivo V60 goes bigger at 6.77 inches but sticks to Full HD+ resolution, also 120Hz. I think Vivo dropped the ball here; at this price, 1.5K should be standard. The higher PPI on the Reno means crisper details for content consumption.
Curved vs Flat: Vivo’s micro quad-curved display offers a premium, immersive experience. It’s perfect for multimedia. But as a gamer, I prefer the Reno’s flat screen—no accidental touches on the edges. Reviews noted thin bezels on both, but the flat design wins for practicality.
Brightness and Features: Opinions vary on brightness. One review noted that the Vivo was a bit brighter outdoors, by 100-200 nits. However, another review said the Reno managed HDR better, keeping highlights intact. Both support HDR on Netflix and YouTube, and have 2160Hz PWM dimming to reduce eye strain. Vivo has neutral color accuracy, while Reno leans warmer. I enjoy the pleasing tones for social media.
Multimedia Perks: Speakers are solid on both with stereo sound. But the Reno’s haptics (O-Haptics) are crisper and more immersive—great for typing or gaming. Vivo’s feel mushy in comparison. Audio codecs like LDAC and LHDC on Reno are a bonus for audiophiles.

I like the Reno. Its high resolution and flat screen make it perfect for gaming and detailed viewing.

Performance: Power Under the Hood

Performance is where I nerd out— I want a phone that’s snappy for multitasking and gaming without lag.

Processors and Benchmarks: The Reno 14 uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8350. It scores about 1.4 million on AnTuTu. Vivo’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 scores closer to 1 million—solid but not as punchy. Real-world tests showed the Reno launching apps and games faster, like BGMI and COD.
RAM and Storage: Here’s the kicker: Reno has LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 3.1 storage—fast for loading and scrolling. Vivo sticks with older LPDDR4X and UFS 2.2, which feels outdated at this price. It makes the Reno snappier overall.
Gaming Experience: Reno runs BGMI at 90FPS, while Vivo is locked at 60FPS. It also offers higher settings in COD. GPU on Reno is better for graphics-heavy tasks, though Vivo’s CPU is more stable. No major heating issues noted in tests, but Reno runs cooler on average.
Connectivity: Both have Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, IR blaster, and stable 5G. Fingerprint scanners are fast optical in-display types.

If gaming and speed are priorities for me, the Reno 14 is the clear winner—it’s future-proofed better.

Camera: The Battle of the Lenses

Many people buy these series for the cameras. The Reno 14 surprisingly beats the Vivo V60, even with Vivo’s Zeiss partnership.

Setup: Both have 50MP main + 50MP telephoto + 8MP ultrawide, with 50MP selfies. Reno’s telephoto is 3.5x, Vivo’s 3x—small difference, but noticeable in zoom.
Photo Quality: Reno delivers warmer, social-media-ready tones; Vivo goes neutral. Details and textures are sharper on Reno in daylight and low light, especially at 1x. Zoom performance: Reno wins at 3.5x, 7x, and 10x; Vivo at 2x, 3x, and 6x. HDR is better on Reno—accurate skies and shadows without overprocessing.
Reno shines in portraits: It offers great edge detection, even when zoomed in. Skin tones are warmer on Reno (which I prefer for vibrancy) but more accurate on Vivo. Ultrawide is average on both, but Reno handles HDR and details better.
Selfies: Vivo shines in regular selfies with better tones and HDR. However, Reno takes the lead in portrait selfies.
Video: Great news for Reno! Enjoy 4K at 60FPS on the main, telephoto, and selfie cameras. It offers top-notch stabilization, vibrant colors, and HDR. Vivo limits to 4K 30FPS and feels less optimized. Portrait video on Reno is a cool extra.
AI Features: Reno’s AI like Best Face (fixes closed eyes) and recompose are handy. Vivo has Zeiss filters and bokeh controls for creativity.

I was shocked Vivo has the camera rep, but Reno takes the crown for versatility right now.

Battery and Charging: Endurance Test

Battery life keeps me going through long days.

Capacity and Charging: Vivo’s 6500mAh battery charges at 90W. It’s bigger and faster than Reno’s 6000mAh battery, which charges at 80W. But actual charge times are similar due to OPPO’s tech—Reno might even edge out.
Screen-on Time: Both deliver 9-10 hours, with Vivo sometimes adding 45-60 minutes more. Great for heavy use.
Features: Reno’s smart charging keeps the battery at 80%. This helps long-term users maintain battery health. Vivo lacks this.

Vivo wins on paper, but they’re neck-and-neck in practice.

Software: User Experience Counts

Software can make or break a phone for me.

UI and Updates: Both on Android 15 ColorOS 15 on Reno, Funtouch OS 15 on Vivo. ColorOS feels modern with smooth animations, better icons, and customizations. Funtouch seems dated. Updates: Vivo offers 4+6 years; Reno 3+4 years.
AI and Bloatware: Reno has useful AI features. It offers call summaries, an AI eraser, and Mind Space for taking notes. Vivo has eraser and captions but fewer. Both have bloatware (uninstallable), but Reno gives more control.

I prefer ColorOS it’s refined and fun.

Final Verdict:

After synthesizing these reviews, the OPPO Reno 14 is my pick for most people. It wins in design, display resolution, performance, camera versatility, and software polish. The Vivo V60 stands out with its larger battery, curved screen, and extended updates. However, it lacks in storage speed and video quality. If cameras and balance are key, grab the Reno. For battery champs or curved-screen fans, Vivo’s your bet.

What do you think? Drop a comment—Reno or Vivo? If this helped, share it with a friend shopping for phones. Thanks for reading; I’ll catch you in the next post.

Join us on Telegram: Click here

Join us on WhatsApp: Click here

Redmi 15 5G Review: Real Performance, Price & User Experience